The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1746•Martha Carrascal v. American Airlines, Inc.
23-1746Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 2, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1746
MARTHA CARRASCAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00825-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 2, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martha Carrascal, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel E. Farrington, Lauren Genvert Goetzl,
FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Martha Carrascal appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment
discrimination action as a sanction for failing to comply with her discovery obligations
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v). After reviewing the record, we conclude that
the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Carrascal’s action. See Mey v.
Phillips, 71 F.4th 203, 217 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s judgment. Carrascal v. Am. Airlines, Inc., No. 1:22-cv-00825-LMB-JFA
(E.D. Va. June 15, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.