The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1761•David Hall Crum v. Walden Commons Corporate Office
23-1761Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 27, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1761
DAVID HALL CRUM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WALDEN COMMONS CORPORATE OFFICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01333-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: June 25, 2024 Decided: June 27, 2024
Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Hall Crum, Appellant Pro Se. Joshua Mark Greenberg, GREENSTEIN, DELORME
& LUCHS, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Hall Crum appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint
without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Crum v. Walden
Commons Corp. Off., No. 1:22-cv-01333-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va., June 14, 2023). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.