Anthony Zappin v. Ancil G. Ramey

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1767
ANTHONY ZAPPIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANCIL G. RAMEY; STEPTOE & JOHNSON PLLC; KEVIN M. DOYLE; JORGE
DOPICO; RACHAEL FLETCHER CIPOLETTI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00080)
Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 2, 2024
Before AGEE and THACKER, Circuit Judges.∗
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Zappin, Appellant Pro Se. Ancil Glenn Ramey, STEPTOE LLP, Huntington,
West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
∗ The opinion is filed by a quorum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Zappin appeals the district court’s orders (a) accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants’ motions to dismiss Zappin’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 civil rights and state law abuse of process claims and for a prefiling injunction
against Zappin; and (b) denying Zappin’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
Zappin v. Ramey, No. 3:22-cv-00080 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 2, 2023; June 20, 2023). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --