The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1828•David Patrick Blevins v. Kathi Vidal; Keisha Morris; Briana Robinson; Timothy P. Callahan
23-1828Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 17, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1828
DAVID PATRICK BLEVINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHI VIDAL; KEISHA MORRIS; BRIANA ROBINSON; TIMOTHY P.
CALLAHAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge. (1:22-cv-02360-BPG)
Submitted: June 13, 2024 Decided: June 17, 2024
Before RUSHING and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Patrick Blevins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Patrick Blevins appeals the magistrate judge’s order dismissing his civil
complaint against members of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, his former
employer, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim upon which
relief could be granted.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order. Blevins v. Vidal, No. 1:22-cv-02360-
BPG (D. Md. June 22, 2023). We also deny Blevins’ motion for consideration of new
evidence on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.