The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1857•Matthew B. Kidder v. Min Ouyang, a/k/a OU Yangmin
23-1857Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1857
MATTHEW B. KIDDER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MIN OUYANG, a/k/a OU Yangmin,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (8:23-cv-00505-TMC)
Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew B. Kidder, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew B. Kidder appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge to dismiss Kidder’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over
Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Kidder v. Ouyang, 8:23-cv-00505-TMC (D.S.C. July 18,
2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.