The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-2009•Anthony Zappin v. Carey, Douglas, Kessler, & Ruby, Pllc; S. Benjamin Bryant
23-2009Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 15, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-2009
ANTHONY ZAPPIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAREY, DOUGLAS, KESSLER, & RUBY, PLLC; S. BENJAMIN BRYANT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston, Chief District Judge. (2:22-cv-00292)
Submitted: April 11, 2024 Decided: April 15, 2024
Before AGEE and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Zappin, Appellant Pro Se. Robert L. Bays, BOWLES RICE, LLP, Parkersburg,
West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Zappin appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation to grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss Zappin’s legal malpractice claim
and for a prefiling injunction against Zappin. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Zappin v. Carey,
Douglas, Kessler, & Ruby, PLLC, No. 2:22-cv-00292 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 30, 2023). We
deny as moot Defendants’ motion to dismiss Zappin’s appeal for failure to prosecute. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.