Anthony G. Bryant v. at&tcorporation; Cricket Wireless; Meta Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-2056
ANTHONY G. BRYANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AT&T CORPORATION; CRICKET WIRELESS; META CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (2:23-cv-03967-JD-SVH)
Submitted: July 30, 2024 Decided: August 1, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony G. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony G. Bryant appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying Bryant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See
Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950) (per curiam) (holding that order denying
motion to proceed in forma pauperis is appealable interlocutory order). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Bryant v. AT&T Corp., No. 2:23-cv-03967-JD-SVH (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 2023). We deny as
moot Bryant’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --