The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-2080•Peter K. Stern v. United States of America
23-2080Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-2080
PETER K. STERN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:23-cv-00185-MR-WCM)
Submitted: February 22, 2024 Decided: February 26, 2024
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter K. Stern, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Peter K. Stern appeals the district court’s order construing his “Complaint and
Petition for Declaratory Judgment” as a petition for a writ of error coram nobis and denying
coram nobis relief. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Stern v. United States, No. 1:23-cv-00185-MR-WCM
(W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.