The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-2198•Michelle Nyarko v. DAVITA KIDNEY CARE; JOHN 1-10 DOES, Inclusive
23-2198Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 11, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-2198
MICHELLE NYARKO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVITA KIDNEY CARE; JOHN 1-10 DOES, Inclusive,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah Lynn Boardman, District Judge. (8:22-cv-01141-DLB)
Submitted: August 13, 2024 Decided: September 11, 2024
Before HARRIS, HEYTENS, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michelle Nyarko, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Schultz Distler, Kathleen A. McGinley,
JACKSON LEWIS PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michelle Nyarko appeals the district court’s orders granting DaVita Kidney Care’s
motion to dismiss Nyarko’s discrimination, failure-to-accommodate, and retaliation
claims, brought pursuant to the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to
12213, and denying what the court construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. Nyarko v. Davita Kidney Care, No. 8:22-cv-01141-DLB (D. Md. filed Mar. 31,
2023 & entered Apr. 3, 2023; Oct. 17, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.