Clarence Anderson, Iii v. FRANK KENDALL, III, Secretary United States Air Force

23-2266Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 18, 2024

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-2266
CLARENCE ANDERSON, III,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
FRANK KENDALL, III, Secretary United States Air Force; LIEUTENANT
GENERAL JEFFREY A. ROCKWELL, The Judge Advocate General United
States Air Force; LIEUTENANT GENERAL MARK NOWLAND, Deputy Chief
of Staff for Operations, Plans and Requirements United States Air Force,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-01139-AJT-IDD)
Submitted: June 4, 2024 Decided: June 18, 2024
Before AGEE, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Anderson, III, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew James Mezger, Assistant United States
Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Anderson, III, appeals the district court’s October 3, 2023, order denying
his motion for reconsideration, which he pursued under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a). We have
reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying relief. See Sartin v. McNair Law Firm PA, 756 F.3d 259, 265-66 (4th Cir. 2014)
(stating standard of review and describing types of errors correctable under Rule 60(a)).
We therefore affirm the district court’s order. Anderson v. Kendall, No. 1:19-cv-01139-
AJT-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 3, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.