The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6002•United States of America v. Philip Ketter
23-6002Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
PHILIP KETTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:19-cr-00183-RJC-DCK-5)
Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 23, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Philip Ketter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Philip Ketter appeals the district court’s order denying Ketter’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 36
motion. We have conducted a de novo review of the record and find no reversible error.
See United States v. Vanderhorst, 927 F.3d 824, 826 (4th Cir. 2019) (providing standard
of review for Rule 36 motion). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Ketter, No. 3:19-cr-00183-RJC-DCK-5 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 12,
2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.