The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6017•United States of America v. Jermel Anthony Coleman
23-6017Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6017
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JERMEL ANTHONY COLEMAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cr-00008-NKM-JCH-1)
Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 23, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jermel Anthony Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jermel Anthony Coleman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
reconsideration of the court’s prior orders denying Coleman’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)
motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of a compassionate
release motion for abuse of discretion. United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329
(4th Cir. 2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the court did not abuse its
discretion and sufficiently explained the reasons for the denial. See United States v. High,
997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial
of compassionate release motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.