Miguel Angel Rivera v. Director Wayne O. Hill

23-6065Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2023

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6065
MIGUEL ANGEL RIVERA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR WAYNE O. HILL; WARDEN AT J.C.I. ALLEN K. GANG;
SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. LEE; SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. LEPA; OFFICER AT
J.C.I. MS. JACKSON; SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. MESSON; OFFICER AT J.C.I.
MR. ASONGOING; WARDEN AT W.C.I. RONALD S. WEBER; COREY
WALKER, Western Correctional Case Manager; OFFICER A. ZEMBOWER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:22-cv-01517-PX)
Submitted: October 26, 2023 Decided: November 15, 2023
Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Miguel A. Rivera-Alvarez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Miguel A. Rivera-Alvarez appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice* his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim for relief under
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Rivera-Alvarez v. Hill, No. 1:22-cv-
01517-PX (D. Md. Dec. 19, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Because the district court dismissed the action without allowing Rivera-Alvarez a
further opportunity to amend the complaint, the order is final and appealable. See Britt v.
DeJoy, 45 F.4th 790, 796 (4th Cir. 2022).

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.