The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6100•Jonathan A. Gilmore v. Lt. Andrews; Lt. Shaw; Captain Keith Martin
23-6100Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 12, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6100
JONATHAN A. GILMORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LT. ANDREWS; LT. SHAW; CAPTAIN KEITH MARTIN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
OFFICER KEVIN CRENSHAW,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03321-D)
Submitted: September 22, 2023 Decided: October 12, 2023
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan A. Gilmore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan A. Gilmore appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his
complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Gilmore v. Lt. Andrews, No.
5:21-ct-03321-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.