The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6147•Phil Caprice Howard v. S. JANSON, Warden; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
23-6147Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6147
PHIL CAPRICE HOWARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
S. JANSON, Warden; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (1:22-cv-03824-BHH)
Submitted: October 19, 2023 Decided: October 24, 2023
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phil Caprice Howard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Phil Caprice Howard, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Howard’s
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which Howard challenged the execution of his sentence. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Howard v. Janson, No. 1:22-cv-03824-BHH (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2023). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.