The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6167•Larry Blakney v. United States of America
23-6167Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 23, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6167
LARRY BLAKNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SOUTH CAROLINA LAW ENFORCEMENT
DIVISION OF HARTSVILLE; FMC BUTNER; WARDEN T. SCARANTINO;
ALAN E. DUBOIS; LOGAN GRADDY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:22-ct-03094-M)
Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 23, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Blakney, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Blakney appeals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) his civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Federal
Tort Claims Act and denying as moot his motion to appoint a guardian ad litem. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Blakney v. United States, No. 5:22-ct-03094-M (E.D.N.C.
Feb. 9, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.