The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6212•Vonell Davis, Jr. v. Mr. Wayne Hill
23-6212Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6212
VONELL DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. WAYNE HILL; MS. MARIA MAXINO-SABUNDAYO; MR. VERNON
CROWELL; PEANUT KIDS, INC.; LIEUTENANT SILAS, Dietary Supervisor;
R. HALE, Captain,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:21-cv-02740-PX)
Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 28, 2023
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vonell Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Diana Lee, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vonell Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint and denying his motion to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Davis v. Hill, No. 1:21-cv-02740-PX (D. Md. Jan. 30, 2023). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.