The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6252•Santana Wimbush v. GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of Virginia
23-6252Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 1, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6252
SANTANA WIMBUSH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of Virginia; JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney
General of Virginia; HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Department of
Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:22-cv-00640-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: September 1, 2023
Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Santana Wimbush, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Santana Wimbush appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted, and a subsequent order denying reconsideration and leave to file an amended
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s orders. Wimbush v. Youngkin, No. 7:22-cv-00640-MFU-JCH
(W.D. Va. Jan. 13 & Mar. 14, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.