The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6258•Lamar Cannady v. Timothy Wright
23-6258Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 25, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6258
LAMAR CANNADY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY WRIGHT; CALEB EDWARDS; SBI SPECIAL AGENT LEON; POLK
COUNTY DETENTION OFFICER CASE; DISTRICT ATTORNEY BETH;
UNNAMED MEDICAL STAFF OF COUNTY JAIL; CORPORAL SILVA;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BYRD; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DRYMER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:22-cv-00163-MR)
Submitted: July 20, 2023 Decided: July 25, 2023
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lamar Cannady, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lamar Cannady appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his amended
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Cannady v. Polk Cnty. Jail,
No. 1:22-cv-00163-MR (W.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2023). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.