Willie Lee Martin, Iii v. Mary Locklear; Todd Ishee

23-6291Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 21, 2023

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6291
WILLIE LEE MARTIN, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARY LOCKLEAR; TODD ISHEE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03021-BO)
Submitted: May 25, 2023 Decided: July 21, 2023
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Lee Martin, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Lee Martin, III, appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. Martin was released from incarceration
during the pendency of this appeal; thus, his appeal of his request for injunctive relief is
moot. See Rendelman v. Rouse, 569 F.3d 182, 186 (4th Cir. 2009). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error in the district court’s dismissal of Martin’s other claims.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in part as moot and affirm the remainder of the district
court’s order. Martin v. Cooper, No. 5:22-ct-03021-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 2023). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED IN PART,
AFFIRMED IN PART

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.