The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6316•Vincent Elliot Wilson v. CAPTAIN BURGESS, 685; BETH ARTHUR, Sheriff
23-6316Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6316
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN BURGESS, #685; BETH ARTHUR, Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:22-cv-00662-DJN-MRC)
Submitted: July 18, 2023 Decided: November 14, 2023
Before RUSHING and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincent Elliot Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Elliot Wilson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous and for failure to state a
claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. Wilson v. Burgess, No. 3:22-cv-00662-DJN-MRC (E.D. Va.
Mar. 14, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.