The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6317•Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr. v. WARDEN JEFFREY NINES; RONALD STOTLER, Chief of Security; MS. SHARON
23-6317Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 25, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6317
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN JEFFREY NINES; RONALD STOTLER, Chief of Security; MS.
SHARON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00244-JRR)
Submitted: October 19, 2023 Decided: October 24, 2023
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nolan Kinard Floyd, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. Floyd v. Nines, No. 1:23-cv-00244-JRR (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2023). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.