The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6327•Luke D. Patterson v. R. M. WOLFE, Warden
23-6327Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 28, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6327
LUKE D. PATTERSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
R. M. WOLFE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:21-cv-00075-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: July 25, 2023 Decided: July 28, 2023
Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luke D. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Luke D. Patterson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider
the court’s prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Patterson v. Wolfe, No. 3:21-cv-00075-GMG-RWT (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 15, 2023). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.