The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6347•Brandon Pickens v. JONATHAN C. MORGAN, Asheville Police Department Officer
23-6347Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 1, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6347
BRANDON PICKENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JONATHAN C. MORGAN, Asheville Police Department Officer; BERENISE
ESTRADA, SNAP Inc. Law Enforcement Operations; SNAP INC. LAW
ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS, Snap Chat,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (5:22-cv-00126-MR)
Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: September 1, 2023
Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Michael Pickens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Pickens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Pickens v. Morgan,
No. 5:22-cv-00126-MR (W.D.N.C. Mar. 28, 2023). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.