Jack Russel Bristol v. Warden C. Carter

23-6355Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2024

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6355
JACK RUSSEL BRISTOL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN C. CARTER,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (1:23-cv-00776-DKC)
Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: February 29, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jack Russel Bristol, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jack Russel Bristol, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing
Bristol’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he sought to challenge his 18 U.S.C.
§§ 2422(b), 2423(b), (e), (f) convictions by way of the savings clause in 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones v. Hendrix, 599 U.S. 465, 477-80 (2023)
(holding that a petitioner cannot use a § 2241 petition to mount successive collateral
challenges to federal convictions or sentence), we conclude that Bristol cannot pursue his
claims in a § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing
Bristol’s § 2241 petition. Bristol v. Carter, No. 1:23-cv-00776-DKC (D. Md.
Mar. 27, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.