The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6360•Cornelius Barnes, a/k/a Cornelius Lamont Barnes v. Ryan Dawson; Robert Daugherty
23-6360Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 18, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6360
CORNELIUS BARNES, a/k/a Cornelius Lamont Barnes,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RYAN DAWSON; ROBERT DAUGHERTY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:20-ct-03164-M)
Submitted: November 6, 2023 Decided: November 17, 2023
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornelius Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Eugene Coleman, III, RAGSDALE
LIGGETT, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cornelius Barnes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Barnes v. Dawson, No. 5:20-ct-03164-M (E.D.N.C.
Mar. 29, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.