The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6413•Harold D. Loaiza-Quintana v. Warden R. Wolfe
23-6413Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6413
HAROLD D. LOAIZA-QUINTANA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN R. WOLFE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00252-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023
Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold D. Loaiza-Quintana, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Harold D. Loaiza-Quintana, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which he challenged the Bureau of Prisons’
calculation of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Loaiza-Quintana v. Wolfe, No. 5:22-cv-
00252-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 17, 2023). We deny Loaiza-Quintana’s motion to
appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.