The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6416•Larry Williams v. Warden Kelly
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6416
LARRY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN KELLY; JAMES SAVGE; DOC DEEZIEN; PAM C. KELLY; SUSAN
THOMAS JAMES; AL GREEN; S. QUE; PAT BARFIELD; JOE HARRIS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Orangeburg. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00004-MGL)
Submitted: June 22, 2023 Decided: June 27, 2023
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Williams appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing Williams’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Williams v. Kelly, No. 5:22-cv-00004-MGL (D.S.C.
Apr. 12, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.