The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6441•United States of America v. Gabriel Z. Kershaw
23-6441Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GABRIEL Z. KERSHAW,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cr-00258-CMC-1)
Submitted: March 29, 2024 Decided: April 30, 2024
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gabriel Z. Kershaw, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gabriel Z. Kershaw appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motion for
compassionate release, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended by the First
Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239, and his motion
for reconsideration. Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse of discretion in the
district court’s determination that the pertinent 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against
compassionate release. See United States v. Bethea, 54 F.4th 826, 831 (4th Cir. 2022)
(stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.