William Washington v. JOHN CANNON FEW, Chief Judge, S.C. Court of Appeals; V. CLAIRE ALLEN

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6507
WILLIAM WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN CANNON FEW, Chief Judge, S.C. Court of Appeals; V. CLAIRE ALLEN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. (9:22-cv-02486-MGL)
Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 5, 2024
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Washington, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William Washington appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). In his informal brief, Washington does not
challenge the bases for the district court’s decision. As such, he has waived any argument
that the district court’s ruling was in error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775
F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (recognizing that “[t]he informal brief is an important
document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that
brief”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Washington v. Few, No. 9:22-
cv-02486-MGL (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --