The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6528•Casey Tyler v. Asst. Superintendent Pamela J. Locklear
23-6528Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 5, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6528
CASEY TYLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ASST. SUPERINTENDENT PAMELA J. LOCKLEAR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:20-cv-00166-WO-JLW)
Submitted: August 15, 2024 Decided: September 5, 2024
Before KING, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Casey Rafael Tyler, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Casey Rafael Tyler appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting Defendant Pamela J. Locklear’s
motion for summary judgment in Tyler’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Tyler also appeals the
magistrate judge’s text orders denying Tyler’s motions to appoint counsel. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Tyler v.
Locklear, No. 1:20-cv-00166-WO-JLW (M.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2021; Apr. 7, 2021; Sept. 30,
2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.