The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6529•Keith W. Jones v. Crystal Atkinson
23-6529Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6529
KEITH W. JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CRYSTAL ATKINSON; CAPTAIN MCPHERSON; SGT HONEYCUTT; SGT
HENDERSON; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HALEY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
SGT GRAHAM; SGT JOLLY; SGT FLOYD; JUSTIN W. BUTLER; BRAD
PERRITT; JULIAN PRIEST; GEORGE BAYSDEN; UNIT MANAGER BROWN;
UNIT MANAGER WEST; UNIT MANAGER LANEHART; UNIT MANAGER
SPIVEY; DOCTOR SCOTT; TODD E. ISHEE; ERIK A. HOOKS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03008-D)
Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: February 29, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Keith W. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Keith W. Jones appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in
favor of Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, in which Jones alleged that
Defendants were deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Jones
v. Atkinson, No. 5:21-ct-03008-D (E.D.N.C. May 12, 2023). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.