The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6587•United States of America v. Jeffrey Roy Crosby
23-6587Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6587
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY ROY CROSBY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00619-CMC-1)
Submitted: August 24, 2023 Decided: August 29, 2023
Before QUATTLEBAUM and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Roy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Michelle Stoughton, Assistant United
States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Roy Crosby appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ
of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Crosby, No. 4:95-cr-
00619-CMC-1 (D.S.C. May 24, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.