The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6589•Thomas Lee Farmer v. R.M. WOLFE, Warden
23-6589Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 3, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6589
THOMAS LEE FARMER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
R.M. WOLFE, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00147-JPB-JPM)
Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 3, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Lee Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas Lee Farmer appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 petition. In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones v. Hendrix, 143 S. Ct.
1857, 1867-69 (2023) (holding that a petitioner cannot use § 2241 petition to mount
successive collateral challenges to federal convictions or sentences), we conclude that
Farmer cannot pursue his claims in a § 2241 petition. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order dismissing Farmer’s § 2241 petition. Farmer v. Wolfe, No. 5:21-cv-00147-
JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. May 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.