United States of America v. Ryan Christopher Fultz

23-6635Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 3, 2023

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6635
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RYAN CHRISTOPHER FULTZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Jamar Kentrell Walker, District Judge. (4:13-cr-00026-JKW-DEM-1)
Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 3, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ryan Christopher Fultz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Christopher Fultz appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Limiting our review of the
record to the issues raised in Fultz’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v.
Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014), and finding no reversible error, we affirm the
district court’s order, United States v. Fultz, No. 4:13-cr-00026-JKW-DEM-1 (E.D. Va.
June 20, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.