Michael Alonza Rufus v. Warden

23-6644Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 29, 2024

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6644
MICHAEL ALONZA RUFUS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00977-PTG-IDD)
Submitted: March 29, 2024 Decided: April 29, 2024
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Alonza Rufus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Alonza Rufus, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition without prejudice and denying reconsideration.*
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s orders. See Rufus v. Warden, No. 1:22-cv-00977-PTG-IDD (E.D. Va. May
3, 2023; Nov. 22, 2022); see also Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723, 793 (2008); Stack v.
Boyle, 342 U.S. 1, 6-7 (1951); Timms v. Johns, 627 F.3d 525, 530-31 (4th Cir. 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Rufus filed the 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition and motion to reconsider while his appeal
of the district court’s criminal judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a
prison sentence was pending. We have since affirmed the criminal judgment. See United
States v. Rufus, No. 22-2161, 2023 WL 6567886 (4th Cir. Oct. 10, 2023).

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.