The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6654•James Lee Cecil, Jr. v. John Bowman; Kevin Jones
23-6654Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 29, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6654
JAMES LEE CECIL, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN BOWMAN; KEVIN JONES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:20-cv-00349-EKD-JCH)
Submitted: November 21, 2023 Decided: November 28, 2023
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Lee Cecil, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Julian Friedman Harf, SPILMAN, THOMAS &
BATTLE, PLLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Lee Cecil, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary
judgment in Cecil’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Cecil v.
Bowman, No. 7:20-cv-00349-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. June 22, 2023). We deny as
unnecessary Bowman’s motion to supplement the record on appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.