Sharif Hakim Moore v. Peter T. Danza

23-6680Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 23, 2023

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6680
SHARIF HAKIM MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETER T. DANZA; D. S. WISE; KIM FOYE; WESLEY HECKMAN; MICHAEL
JASON JARMAN; BENJAMIN LEWIS; ANTHONY J. TAYLOR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03360-BO-RJ)
Submitted: November 16, 2023 Decided: November 22, 2023
Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sharif Hakim Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Sharif Hakim Moore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 amended complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Moore v.
Danza, No. 5:22-ct-03360-BO-RJ (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2023). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.