The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6700•Barney Adrian Dunlap v. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution
23-6700Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 27, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6700
BARNEY ADRIAN DUNLAP,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Lanesboro Correctional Institution,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Statesville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (5:15-cv-00139-MR)
Submitted: June 25, 2024 Decided: June 27, 2024
Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barney Adrian Dunlap, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Barney Adrian Dunlap appeals the district court’s order denying two postjudgment
filings in Dunlap’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Dunlap v. Mitchell,
No. 5:15-cv-00139-MR (W.D.N.C. June 28, 2023). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.