The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6743•United States of America v. Darryl Antonio Wright, a/k/a Kimo
23-6743Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 7, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6743
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRYL ANTONIO WRIGHT, a/k/a Kimo,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cr-00986-TLW-8)
Submitted: May 20, 2024 Decided: June 7, 2024
Before HARRIS, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darryl Antonio Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Antonio Wright appeals the district court’s order construing his sentence
reduction motion as a motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)
and dismissing it without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Wright
also appeals the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. The record discloses
that Wright filed his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), which does not require
exhaustion, and sought relief based upon U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4A1.1.
Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s orders and remand with instructions to consider
Wright’s motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.