The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6768•Nathaniel R. Webb v. Trooper Hundley; Trooper Clayton; Sergeant Gardner; Sergeant Gaskins
23-6768Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 29, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6768
NATHANIEL R. WEBB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TROOPER HUNDLEY; TROOPER CLAYTON; SERGEANT GARDNER;
SERGEANT GASKINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:20-ct-03326-BO)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: December 28, 2023
Before HARRIS and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel R. Webb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel R. Webb appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint as barred by the statute of limitations and denying his subsequent Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. Webb v. Hundley, No. 5:20-ct-03326-
BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2023 & July 19, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.