The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6797•United States of America v. KENNETH O’NEAL TIMMONS, a/k/a Keno, a/k/a Kino
23-6797Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6797
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH O’NEAL TIMMONS, a/k/a Keno, a/k/a Kino,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cr-00513-JFA-39)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 3, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth O’Neal Timmons, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant
United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth O’Neal Timmons appeals the district court’s order denying his second
motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). After reviewing the
record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Timmons’
motion. See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. United States v. Timmons, No. 3:12-
cr-00513-JFA-39 (D.S.C. Aug. 1, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.