The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6897•Rondall Clyde Mixson v. Warden Janson
23-6897Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2023
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6897
RONDALL CLYDE MIXSON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN JANSON,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:23-cv-01618-DCN)
Submitted: October 31, 2023 Decided: November 3, 2023
Before HARRIS and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rondall Clyde Mixson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Rondall Clyde Mixson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order adopting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Mixson’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 petition in which he challenged the execution of his sentence. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Mixson v. Janson, No. 2:23-cv-01618-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2023). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.