The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6912•David Antonio Little, Jr. v. CODY DIXON, Chesterfield County Sheriff; DAVID BROWN, Chesterfield County Sheriff
23-6912Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 7, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6912
DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CODY DIXON, Chesterfield County Sheriff; DAVID BROWN, Chesterfield
County Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
TYLER GOLDBACH, MD; JAMES DIXON, Sheriff,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock
Hill. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (0:22-cv-03851-RMG)
Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 6, 2024
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
David Antonio Little, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, DAVIDSON,
WREN & DEMASTERS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
David Antonio Little, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Little’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Little v. Dixon, No. 0:22-cv-03851-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 5,
2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.