Octavious Edward Elmore v. Mecklenburg County Courthouse

23-6953Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2023

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6953
OCTAVIOUS EDWARD ELMORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
S.J.I.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MECKLENBURG COUNTY COURTHOUSE; MECKLENBURG COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Individual and Official Capacity; GARY
MCFADDEN, Individual and Official Capacity; LISA CRUMP MCDANIEL,
Individual and Official Capacity; JOHNNY JENNINGS, Individual and Official
Capacity; SPENCER MERRIWEATHER, III, Individual and Official Capacity;
LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.; KATIE MCABEE, Individual and
Official Capacity; JASMINE ALICIA IVEY, Individual Capacity; CHARLOTTE
MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, In their Official Capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (3:23-cv-00036-MR)
Submitted: December 14, 2023 Decided: December 19, 2023
Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Octavious Edward Elmore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Octavious Edward Elmore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failure to state a claim.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Elmore v. Mecklenburg Cnty. Courthouse, 3:23-cv-00036-MR
(W.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.