Steven Craig Whyte v. R. SKINNER, Federal Correctional Officer

23-6961Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 11, 2024

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6961
STEVEN CRAIG WHYTE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
R. SKINNER, Federal Correctional Officer; D. MCINTYRE, Federal Correctional
Officer; FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HUNT; FEDERAL
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STICKNEY; LIEUTENANT BARBER;
LIEUTENANT BARRIENTOS; LIEUTENANT ABDELLAZ; A. MOYERS,
Federal Correctional Officer, Health Service Staff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:21-cv-00009-GMG)
Submitted: August 30, 2024 Decided: October 11, 2024
Before KING and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Craig Whyte, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Steven Craig Whyte appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Whyte’s amended complaint filed pursuant to
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Whyte v. Skinner, No. 3:21-cv-00009-GMG (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 11,
2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.