The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-6969•Antwyn Gibbs v. Donald Ames
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-6969
ANTWYN GIBBS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DONALD AMES,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:21-cv-00577)
Submitted: December 14, 2023 Decided: December 19, 2023
Before GREGORY and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antwyn Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Sara See, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antwyn Gibbs appeals the district court’s order denying his postjudgment motion
for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Gibbs’ motion for appointment of counsel on appeal and affirm the
district court’s order.* Gibbs v. Ames, No. 2:21-cv-00577 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 15, 2023).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* To the extent Gibbs seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the
magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, or
the court’s subsequent orders denying his other postjudgment motions, those orders are not
properly before us in this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (4)(A).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.