The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-7010•Jeremy Paul Defour v. Lieutenant Webber
23-7010Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 18, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7010
JEREMY PAUL DEFOUR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT WEBBER; OFFICER BEATY, a/k/a Officer Bates;
INTELLIGENCE OFFICER ROSSON; LIEUTENANT BROWN; WARDEN
EDMONDS; CHIEF OF HOUSING WALKER; ASSISTANT WARDEN
MOORE; OPERATIONS MANAGER BRYANT; HEARING OFFICER
STANTON, f/k/a Hearing Officer Forbes; MAJOR ROSS; UNIT MANAGER
BOOKER; SGT. RANDOLPH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (7:22-cv-00379-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: October 31, 2024 Decided: January 17, 2025
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeremy Paul Defour, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeremy Paul Defour appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
in favor of Defendants in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and denying Defour’s motions for
sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Defour v. Webber, No. 7:22-cv-00379-JPJ-PMS (W.D.
Va. Sept. 20, 2023). We deny Defour’s motion to assign counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.