The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-7011•Askari Danso Ms Lumumba v. Chadwick Dotson
23-7011Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7011
ASKARI DANSO MS LUMUMBA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHADWICK DOTSON; JOSEPH W. WALTERS; DAVID ANDERSON; BARRY
KANODE; D. HAYNES; J. SPANGLER; STURDIVANT; JOHN DOE, K-9 Officer
River North,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Chief District Judge. (7:22-cv-00396-MFU-JCH)
Submitted: May 30, 2024 Decided: June 3, 2024
Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Askari Danso MS Lumumba, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Askari Danso MS Lumumba appeals the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1)
for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Lumumba v. Dotson, No. 7:22-cv-00396-MFU-JCH (W.D. Va. Sept. 14, 2023).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.