The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-7025•Samuel Ellis v. Patricia Walker; Diane Browning; Edward Lance
23-7025Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 2, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7025
SAMUEL ELLIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA WALKER; DIANE BROWNING; EDWARD LANCE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-ct-03048-BO)
Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Ellis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel Ellis appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions for additional
discovery and to appoint counsel, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants, and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Ellis v. Wilson, et al., No. 5:21-ct-03048-BO
(E.D.N.C. Jan. 10, 2023; May 26, 2023; Sept. 11, 2023). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.